Few questions about God are more troubling than the existence of evil. Last week we considered why God allows suffering, but evil takes us into a different part of the problem. Suffering can arise through illness, natural disaster, ageing or circumstances for which no individual person appears responsible. Evil is different because it involves moral choice. Human beings deliberately deceive, abuse, exploit, torture, murder and destroy. History contains examples of cruelty on a scale that is difficult even to comprehend.

That creates an uncomfortable question for anyone who believes in a good and powerful God. If God sees an evil act before it happens and possesses the power to stop it, why does He sometimes allow it to occur? Why does He permit one person to use freedom to destroy the life of another? At what point does allowing evil appear incompatible with goodness?

Scripture does not treat evil lightly, nor does it describe God as its author. Instead, the Bible presents evil as a rebellion against what God desires for His creation. It takes human freedom seriously, recognises a spiritual dimension to evil, promises judgement, and ultimately points towards Jesus Christ as God’s answer to a world in which evil appears, at times, frighteningly powerful.

Where Does Evil Come From?

Before asking why God allows evil, we need to ask where evil originates. Genesis presents creation as the deliberate work of God, but evil enters the human story through rebellion. Humanity is given genuine responsibility and chooses to distrust God’s command.

This distinction is important because it means that creating beings capable of evil is not the same thing as creating evil itself. A capacity can be used in more than one direction. The ability to speak makes it possible to encourage someone, but it also makes lying possible. Physical strength can protect the vulnerable or oppress them. Intelligence can solve problems or devise new ways to exploit people.

Much of what we call evil is therefore not the existence of some additional thing God has manufactured. It is the corruption or misuse of something that was capable of good. Love can become possessiveness, authority can become tyranny, sexuality can become exploitation, ambition can become greed, and freedom can become rebellion. That does not make evil unreal, but it helps us understand why a world containing genuine moral beings also contains the possibility that those beings will misuse what they have been given.

Why Give Us Freedom at All?

The obvious response is to ask why God created us with the ability to choose wrongly. Surely He could have created human beings who always did what was right. Perhaps He could have created creatures whose behaviour was entirely predetermined, but something fundamental would then be missing from human existence.

Scripture does not present God’s purpose for humanity merely as producing creatures that perform the correct actions. It repeatedly speaks in terms of love, faithfulness, obedience, trust and relationship, and those things require meaningful choice. Love that cannot be withheld is difficult to describe as love in the fullest sense. Courage has meaning because fear and retreat are possible. Faithfulness matters because betrayal is possible. Generosity is morally significant because selfishness is possible, while obedience has meaning because disobedience remains an option.

Freedom therefore makes extraordinary goodness possible, but the same freedom makes terrible evil possible as well. This does not mean God values freedom more than the victims of evil. It means that creating morally responsible beings involves allowing their decisions to have genuine significance. If every harmful choice were automatically prevented from producing consequences, our freedom would become strangely unreal.

Why Doesn’t God Stop Us Before We Do Something Evil?

Imagine a world in which God intervened every time someone attempted to commit evil. A person raises a weapon, but their arm becomes incapable of moving. Someone attempts to steal, but the object becomes impossible to take. A lie is about to be spoken, but the person suddenly loses the ability to speak. At first, such a world sounds attractive because many terrible events would never happen.

The difficulty appears when we ask where intervention should begin. Should God prevent murder but allow assault? Should He prevent assault but permit intimidation? Should He prevent theft but allow greed? Should He stop adultery, manipulation, bullying, dishonesty, gossip and every cruel word? Eventually we reach the thoughts and intentions from which actions arise. Should God prevent us from even forming a selfish intention?

A world in which every wrong action is prevented at the moment we attempt it would no longer be a world in which moral choice carries meaningful consequences. We might possess theoretical freedom, but we could never actually exercise it in ways God disapproved of. That would radically alter what it means to be human and would raise serious questions about whether our choices remained genuinely ours.

Does Allowing Evil Mean God Approves of It?

There is an enormous difference between permitting something to happen and approving of what happens. Parents understand this distinction imperfectly but usefully. As children grow, parents gradually allow them to make decisions they would not themselves choose. Sometimes those decisions have painful consequences. A parent may strongly disapprove of the decision while recognising that continually removing every consequence would prevent the child from becoming genuinely responsible.

The comparison has obvious limits because God is not simply a human parent writ large. Nevertheless, it demonstrates the logical distinction between permission and approval. Scripture repeatedly condemns murder, injustice, exploitation, deceit, oppression and cruelty. God’s willingness to permit human beings to perform such actions cannot therefore reasonably be interpreted as divine endorsement of them.

Indeed, the biblical idea of judgement only makes sense if God distinguishes between what He permits human beings to do and what He desires them to do. Permission gives human choices reality; judgement declares that those choices still carry moral significance.

What About Satan?

The Bible also presents evil as having a spiritual dimension. Satan appears as an adversary, deceiver and tempter. Jesus describes the devil in John 8:44 as associated with murder and falsehood, while elsewhere the New Testament presents evil as involving spiritual forces as well as human decisions.

This matters because Christianity does not reduce evil entirely to bad education, unfortunate circumstances or psychological weakness. Human beings can certainly be influenced by their environment, but Scripture recognises something deeper: there is a spiritual opposition to God’s purposes. Yet Satan cannot become an excuse for human wrongdoing because Scripture consistently treats people as morally responsible for their choices.

The Genesis account illustrates this clearly. The serpent tempts, but Adam and Eve choose. Responsibility is not transferred entirely to the tempter. Christian teaching therefore holds two realities together: evil has a spiritual dimension, but human beings remain responsible moral agents. Temptation may come from outside us, but temptation is not the same as compulsion, and the existence of temptation does not absolve us of responsibility for what we choose to do with it.

Why Does Evil Sometimes Seem to Succeed?

This may be one of the hardest parts of the question. Evil does not always appear to receive immediate punishment. Sometimes dishonest people prosper while decent people struggle. Powerful people can exploit others for years. Dictators can die after causing enormous suffering, and criminals sometimes escape earthly justice altogether.

The Bible notices this problem. The Psalms repeatedly wrestle with the apparent prosperity of the wicked, while prophets complain about injustice and oppression. Scripture does not pretend that every moral account is settled immediately. If justice always occurred instantly, moral life would look very different. Every lie might produce immediate punishment, every act of generosity immediate reward and every crime instant judgement. People could quickly learn to behave correctly through self-interest rather than moral transformation.

Instead, Scripture presents history as a period in which human choices unfold and judgement is sometimes delayed. Delayed justice, however, is not the same as absent justice. Christianity ultimately claims that human courts and historical consequences are not the final measure of what matters. People may escape earthly accountability, but Scripture insists that human life remains accountable before God. That belief does not remove the pain caused when justice fails now, but it means evil’s apparent victories are not necessarily its final victories.

Why Doesn’t God Judge Evil Immediately?

There is another uncomfortable aspect to this question. We often want God to remove evil, but usually we are thinking about particularly terrible forms of evil committed by other people. Scripture forces us to look closer to home and consider what immediate and universal judgement would actually mean.

If God were to remove all evil immediately, where exactly would He draw the line? We may not be murderers or tyrants, but we have still been selfish, dishonest, cruel, resentful or indifferent. We have hurt people, sometimes knowingly. A God who instantly eliminated every person who acted wrongly would eventually confront all of us.

The delay of judgement can therefore also be understood as an expression of mercy. God gives human beings time to repent, change and seek reconciliation. This does not mean victims should simply tolerate wrongdoing while waiting for offenders to improve. Justice, protection and appropriate consequences remain important, and mercy towards an offender does not require abandoning the person who has been harmed. It does mean that God’s patience should not automatically be mistaken for indifference.

Can God Bring Good Out of Evil?

Scripture repeatedly shows God bringing good from circumstances created by evil people. Joseph’s story is one of the clearest examples. His brothers betray him, sell him and then deceive their father about what happened. Nothing in the story requires us to call their behaviour good.

Yet years later Joseph can look back and recognise that God has worked through the consequences of what happened to preserve life. Genesis 50:20 captures the principle: his brothers intended evil, but God was able to bring a different purpose from their actions. That distinction is essential because Christianity does not teach that evil secretly becomes good simply because God uses it.

Betrayal remains betrayal, abuse remains abuse and murder remains murder. What Scripture claims is something more hopeful: evil cannot necessarily prevent God from accomplishing good. We see the same principle most powerfully in the crucifixion of Jesus.

What Does the Cross Tell Us About Evil?

The crucifixion brings together almost every form of moral evil. There is betrayal, political cowardice, false accusation, religious hypocrisy, mob pressure, humiliation, torture and execution. Jesus is not crucified because human beings suddenly behave well; He is crucified because human beings do terrible things.

Yet Christianity places this event at the centre of God’s work of redemption. The cross does not show God calling evil good. It shows God taking what evil does and refusing to allow evil to determine the final outcome. Those responsible intend humiliation and death, while God brings redemption and resurrection.

This becomes one of Christianity’s most powerful answers to evil. God’s response is not merely to prevent every evil action from occurring. He enters a world where evil occurs and demonstrates that even evil cannot ultimately defeat His purposes. The cross appears to be evil’s victory, but the resurrection declares that it was not.

Could God Have Created a World Where Everyone Freely Chose Good?

This is an intriguing question. Could God have created genuinely free beings while somehow ensuring that every one of them always chose what was right? We quickly encounter the limits of what we can know because we do not know every logically possible form of creation, and Scripture does not provide a philosophical explanation of every alternative world God might have created.

What we can observe is the world we actually inhabit. Here, human choices are real enough to produce consequences, and Scripture treats our decisions as morally meaningful. Perhaps freedom necessarily includes genuine possibility. If someone is guaranteed never to choose otherwise, we may reasonably ask in what sense the alternative is truly available.

This does not completely solve the emotional problem of evil. When confronting atrocities, philosophical discussions about freedom can feel painfully inadequate. The argument does, however, help us understand why God might value a world containing genuine moral agency despite the terrible risks that accompany it.

What About Particularly Horrific Evil?

Here intellectual explanations reach their limit. It is one thing to discuss free will abstractly; it is another to think about genocide, child abuse, torture or deliberate cruelty towards vulnerable people. We should never use theology to make these things sound less horrific than they are.

Jesus’ teaching does not encourage indifference towards victims. He repeatedly moves towards those who are vulnerable, excluded and suffering. Christian discipleship therefore cannot consist merely of explaining why God permits evil. We are also called to oppose it.

If someone is being abused, the Christian response is not simply to say that the abuser possesses free will. The victim needs protection, evil may need to be exposed, authorities may need to become involved and justice may need to be pursued. God allowing moral freedom does not give Christians permission to remain passive while others suffer.

Indeed, one of the ways God confronts evil in the world may be through people who choose courage, justice, compassion and truth. Our freedom can be used to inflict suffering, but that same freedom can also be used to protect, restore and heal.

Why Doesn’t God Make Himself So Obvious That Nobody Would Choose Evil?

Even certainty about God’s existence would not necessarily produce goodness. Scripture contains people who believe God exists yet still rebel against Him, which reminds us that knowledge and obedience are not identical.

Human experience confirms the same principle. We often know something is wrong and do it anyway. We know anger can hurt those we love, yet still speak harshly. We know greed can damage others, yet still want more. We know dishonesty destroys trust, yet sometimes lie to protect ourselves.

The fundamental problem is therefore deeper than lack of evidence. Evil involves the direction of the human will. Christianity consequently focuses not merely upon proving God’s existence but upon transformation of character. Jesus calls people to repentance, forgiveness, love and a different way of living. God’s purpose is not simply that we acknowledge He exists, but that we become the kind of people who increasingly desire what is good.

Does God Ever Intervene Against Evil?

Scripture says that He does. There are occasions when God restrains individuals, judges nations, delivers people from danger or overturns wicked plans. The difficult question is why He does so in some circumstances and apparently not in others.

Here we reach one of the boundaries of human understanding because we simply do not possess enough information to explain every instance of divine action or apparent inaction. That admission is important. Christians can sometimes damage faith by offering confident explanations Scripture itself does not give. Telling someone exactly why God allowed a particular murder, war or tragedy may say more about our need for an explanation than about God’s actual purposes.

Faith does not require us to pretend to possess knowledge we do not have. Sometimes the most truthful answer is that we do not know why God intervened in one situation but not another. What Scripture asks us to trust is not our ability to explain every event, but the character of God revealed throughout Scripture and ultimately through Jesus Christ.

Will Evil Always Exist?

The Christian answer is no, and this is perhaps the most important difference between saying God allows evil and saying God accepts evil. Scripture presents evil as temporary rather than eternal, and the biblical story moves towards judgement, restoration and the final defeat of everything opposed to God.

God’s present permission should therefore not be mistaken for His ultimate intention. We are living during a period in which human freedom, rebellion, repentance, mercy and redemption are all unfolding. God has not yet brought history to its conclusion, and the fact that evil continues today does not mean He has decided evil should continue forever.

Christian hope looks towards a creation in which evil no longer dominates human experience. The patience of God allows time for repentance and redemption, but Scripture also insists that evil will finally be confronted rather than simply tolerated without end.

What Should We Do About Evil?

The question “Why does God allow evil?” can sometimes place all responsibility upon God while leaving us outside the discussion. Yet Scripture repeatedly turns the question back towards us and asks what we are doing about the evil we encounter.

We may have little influence over wars, dictators or organised crime, but evil also appears in ordinary life. Dishonesty, cruelty, prejudice, exploitation, resentment, gossip, selfishness and indifference all damage people. Romans 12:21 directs believers not to be overcome by evil, but to overcome evil with good.

That does not mean pretending evil is harmless. Sometimes goodness requires confrontation, boundaries, justice and courage. Christians are not called merely to complain that darkness exists; we are called to refuse to contribute to it and, where possible, to push against it.

Every act of forgiveness, courage, generosity, honesty and compassion becomes a rejection of the logic by which evil operates. We may not be able to remove all evil from the world, but we can decide whether our own choices increase it or resist it.

So Why Does God Allow Evil?

Scripture does not give us one sentence that resolves every aspect of the question. What it gives us is a larger picture in which God created human beings capable of meaningful moral choice. That freedom allows love, faithfulness, courage and goodness to be genuine, but it also creates the possibility of rebellion. Human beings have repeatedly used that freedom destructively.

God permits choices He does not approve of, but permission is not endorsement. He warns, restrains, judges, calls people to repentance and sometimes intervenes directly. At other times He allows human decisions to produce consequences that can be terribly painful. Yet evil never becomes something God calls good.

The cross demonstrates this most clearly. Human beings take Jesus Christ and subject Him to betrayal, injustice, cruelty and death. If we stopped the story on the day of the crucifixion, evil would appear to have won. Christianity, however, does not stop the story there because resurrection follows.

That pattern tells us something about the nature of Christian hope. God does not need to approve of evil in order to use circumstances created by evil. He can take what human beings intend for destruction and bring from it something they never intended.

This does not answer every question. It does not tell us why God prevented one atrocity but allowed another, why one victim escaped while another did not, or why justice sometimes seems painfully delayed. There are mysteries we may not resolve in this life, and Scripture does not require us to pretend otherwise.

What Scripture does give us is enough to reject two conclusions. We need not conclude that evil proves God is evil, and we need not conclude that because God allows something, He approves of it. Instead, Christianity presents God as the One against whom evil ultimately rebels and the One who will ultimately overcome it.

Where Does This Leave Us?

Perhaps the question eventually becomes more personal than we expected. We begin by asking why God allows other people to commit terrible evil, but Scripture asks us to examine what we ourselves do with the freedom we have been given.

Every day we make choices that move in one direction or another. We can tell the truth or distort it, forgive or nurture resentment, help someone vulnerable or ignore them, use power responsibly or selfishly, encourage or humiliate, love or withdraw into indifference. Most of these decisions will never appear in history books, but they matter because they reveal what we are becoming.

God’s answer to evil is therefore not only future judgement. It also includes transformation in the present. Through Christ, people who have lived selfishly can learn generosity, those consumed by hatred can learn forgiveness, and those who have caused harm can repent and become different.

The existence of evil remains one of the most difficult challenges to faith, particularly when we encounter its worst consequences. Christianity does not ask us to pretend otherwise. It asks us to look at evil clearly, call it what it is and refuse to confuse God’s patience with approval. Then it points us towards Christ, where evil does its worst at the cross but still does not have the final word. The resurrection declares that even death itself cannot permanently defeat the purposes of God.

Perhaps, then, “Why does God allow evil?” should eventually lead to another question. If God has given us genuine freedom in a world where both good and evil are possible, what are we choosing to do with the freedom He has given us?

Explore More

If you have found this helpful, there is more to explore across Saints of the Restoration. You can continue with our Daily Bread devotionals, go deeper through The Deeper Walk, consider some of Life’s Questions, reflect through Bible Poetry, or browse our growing library of free Christian books and study resources.

Would you like to discuss this privately

If this article has raised a question, concern, or something you would rather not discuss publicly you are welcome to send me a message